Advocating for Science, Technology, and Innovation in Georgia
As part of IEEE-USA’s ongoing efforts to strengthen engineering advocacy, we participated in the Congressional Outreach Program (ICOP) in Georgia, engaging directly with policymakers to discuss key technology policies. This initiative, facilitated by IEEE-USA and led locally by IEEE Atlanta Section – Young Professionals (YP), brought together a diverse group of engineers, researchers, educators, and industry professionals to highlight the critical role of science and technology in shaping Georgia’s innovation ecosystem.
From the moment we were invited to participate in ICOP, it was clear this was a rare and valuable opportunity to see how technology-based policy takes shape at the highest levels of government. More than just formal meetings, the experience revealed how meaningful advocacy depends on individuals willing to invest their time and expertise in informing decision-makers. IEEE-USA played a key role in preparing participants for this engagement by offering workshops and guidance on how to effectively communicate with congressional representatives and their staff. These training sessions covered essential topics such as how legislative offices operate, how to frame policy discussions, and the best ways to present technical issues in a way that resonates with policymakers.
Engaging Georgia’s Congressional Representatives
Over two days, we met with key congressional offices, including Senator Raphael Warnock and Representative Lucy McBath on Day 1 (19 September), and Senator Jon Ossoff and Representative Rich McCormick on Day 2 (20 September). These meetings provided a unique platform to highlight the importance of federal support for engineering research, workforce development, and technological innovation. Each discussion reinforced the significance of policies that drive advancements in semiconductors, artificial intelligence, hardware and software development, energy, healthcare, and more.
Our meetings were structured yet engaging, allowing for open dialogue on how federal funding and legislation directly impact local innovation and economic growth. The policymakers we met with were receptive to our insights, and it was encouraging to see bipartisan recognition of the importance of investment in STEM education, research, and industry-academia collaboration. Staffers from different political affiliations found common ground on issues related to technology, workforce development, and economic competitiveness, underscoring the role that science and engineering play in national policy.
Bringing Together a Diverse Engineering Community
To ensure broad representation, we invited participants from universities and industries across the Atlanta metro area, including Georgia Tech, Georgia State University (GSU), Kennesaw State University (KSU), the University of Georgia (UGA), and DeVry University. In addition, we welcomed researchers, educators, industry professionals from sectors such as semiconductor, software, hardware, energy, AI/ML, medtech, and engineering education as well as undergraduate and graduate students. This diverse participation allowed us to present a comprehensive perspective on the needs and challenges faced by Georgia’s engineering and technology communities.
Beyond university and industry involvement, this event also served as a learning experience for students. Several IEEE student members had the opportunity to engage in legislative discussions for the first time, stepping into the world of policy advocacy and technology legislation. This direct exposure emphasized the importance of investing in the next generation of engineers and researchers, ensuring that they have a voice in shaping the policies that will govern their future careers.
Key Policy Priorities and Legislative Discussions
Our advocacy efforts focused on several key policy areas. The CHIPS and Science Act was a central topic, as we emphasized its role in funding semiconductor research, workforce training, and the development of local innovation hubs. We broke down the legislation into practical applications, illustrating how continued investment benefits not only large corporations and federal labs but also smaller research teams, startups, and universities. Another key focus was the CREATE AI initiative, which aims to expand artificial intelligence research and access to resources for students, researchers, and entrepreneurs. AI is becoming increasingly integrated into fields such as education, healthcare, and transportation, and ensuring broad access to AI tools will help drive future innovations.
Discussions also covered immigration policies for highly skilled STEM workers, as we addressed the challenges that researchers and tech professionals face in securing work opportunities in the U.S. In addition, we explored the importance of local research and incubator hubs, highlighting initiatives like Curiosity Lab at Peachtree Corners, which is developing smart-city infrastructure, and Rowen, a research development project focused on interdisciplinary collaboration in agriculture, medicine, and environmental sciences. We also discussed Georgia Tech’s partnership with Absolics to establish a glass substrate fabrication facility, an investment that not only boosts research funding but also strengthens local industry and job creation.
The Impact of Local Advocacy and the Role of IEEE-USA
One of the most valuable aspects of the program was the opportunity to see how impactful direct advocacy can be. Our meetings demonstrated that legislators and their staff are genuinely interested in hearing from experts in the field, and we were even informed that congressional offices can provide letters of support for grants and research projects, an insight that could prove valuable for future initiatives.
Beyond policy discussions, ICOP provided an opportunity to build lasting connections with colleagues, IEEE-USA representatives, and policymakers. Informal conversations after sessions sparked new ideas and deepened professional relationships that will continue beyond this event. The program also reaffirmed the important role IEEE-USA plays in bridging the gap between engineering and public policy. IEEE-USA provides the tools and platform for engineers to advocate for policies that support innovation, research, and workforce development, ensuring that our voices are heard in legislative decisions.
Looking Ahead: Strengthening Local Advocacy Efforts
Our participation in the IEEE-USA Congressional Outreach Program (ICOP) in Georgia reinforced the importance of local advocacy in shaping science and technology policy. It also emphasized how engineering professionals can have a tangible impact on legislation by engaging directly with policymakers. As technology continues to evolve, these conversations must continue, ensuring that policies keep pace with innovation.
The future of technological progress depends on the collective efforts of engineers, researchers, educators, and policymakers. By strengthening the connection between science and policy, we can ensure that the next generation of scientists, technologists, and innovators are supported in their research, education, and careers. With the support of IEEE-USA and the dedication of our engineering community, we are making a meaningful impact on public policy at both state and national levels.
Moving forward, it is essential that we continue fostering relationships with policymakers, increasing IEEE member participation in policy discussions, and strengthening collaborations between government, industry, and academia to ensure sustainable investment in technology and education.
Dr. Razvan (Chris) Voicu is an IEEE Senior Member and a Professor at Kennesaw State University, known for his expertise in advanced programming, mechatronics, computer networking, and biomedical engineering.
Dr. Yusuf Samet Yaras is an IEEE Member and Chair of the IEEE Atlanta Young Professionals. He is a research faculty member in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Dr. Yaras works at the intersection of optics, acoustics, and electronics, developing diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices with the ultimate goal of translating these technologies into more effective clinical procedures.
